Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165214 (ALL)

SMT. NEELAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/993/2025 · 2025-09-22

Prashant Kumar, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 993 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 4 and Shri K.K. Pandey, Advocate whose Power on behalf of Nagar Nigam- respondent nos.2 and 3 is taken on record. 2. The counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow states that taking cognizance of the complaint of the petitioner regarding alleged encroachment on Gata no.595, which is recorded as a 'rasta' in the revenue records, a team was constituted and inspection was conducted and the next date fixed is 26.09.2025. If any encroachment is found, it shall be removed. 3. The petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid statement, however without recording our own opinion and without prejudicing the rights, if any, of the persons alleged to have encroached the 'rasta'. We need not proceed any further. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 22, 2025 Arnima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Smt. Neelam Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench