Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165211 (ALL)

MADAN RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8876/2025 · 2025-09-17

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8876 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Virendra Kumar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.160 of 2025 under Sections 409, 120B I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 13.05.2025 against a solitary named accused Pramod Kumar Upadhyaya stating that the informants have entered into an agreement with a solitary named person for purchasing plots of land in H.K. Infra Vision Pvt. Ltd. and sale deeds were executed in the year 2018 but the informant's were not given possession of the land. 4. During investigation, it came to light that the applicant was the Additional Director in the Company and, therefore, he has also been implicated. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been stated that the applicant used to work as a Driver in the Company. 6. The applicant's involvement in five other cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, which are similar in nature. 7. The named accused person- Pramod Kumar Upadhyaya has been granted bail in the present case by means of an order dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.7263 of 2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Ram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 8. The learned A.G.A.- has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge- sheet has already been submitted. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the solitary named accused person has already been granted bail in the present case whereas is languishing in jail since 10.07.2025 whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Madan Ram be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 17, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8876 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench