[2025:RJ-JP:15535] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7466/2024 1. Ramdhan Mali S/o Mangi Lal Mali, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Badgav, Tehsil Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) 2. Ghisha S/o Mangi Lal Mali, Aged About 52 Years, Residents Of Badgav, Tehsil Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) 3. Gopal S/o Mangi Lal Mali, Aged About 37 Years, Residents Of Badgav, Tehsil Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Collector, Collector Office, Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj.) 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Office, Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) 5. Prahlad Gurjar S/o Hari Gurjar, Resident Biliya, Tehsil Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/04/2025 On 07.02.2025, this Court passed the following order:- “This writ petition is filed with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or directions:- [2025:RJ-JP:15535] (2 of 2) [CW-7466/2024] a) the respondent No.5 may be restrained from dispossess the petitioner from the land of petitioner situate in Khasra No.1821, 1823/3014 Village Badgav, Tehsil Bhinai, District Ajmer and respondent No.5 may not allowed to cultivate the land in question b) any other appropriate relief which this Hon’ble High Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioners.” Prima facie, this Court is not satisfied that this writ petition is maintainable against the respondent no.5- a private individual. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted time to complete his instructions. List the matter after eight weeks as prayed.” Today, none appears for the petitioners even in second round. In view thereof, since, the writ petition is directed against a private person discharging no public duty, it is not found to be maintainable and is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/55