Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16520 (UTT)

RAGHVENDRA TIWARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/215/2022 · 2025-12-19

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11417 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No.215 of 2022 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State. 3. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist assailing the orders dated 06.08.2018 and 30.07.2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Misc. Case No. 191 of 2017, Shilpa Agarwal Vs. Raghvendra Tiwari, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, as well as the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2019. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is further submitted that a settlement agreement was entered into between the parties and the same has been made part of the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court. In terms of the said settlement, all pending cases instituted by either party are required to be withdrawn. 5. Learned counsel for the revisionist, therefore, prays that the present revision be disposed of and that the impugned orders challenged herein be quashed, in 2025:UHC:11417 terms of the settlement agreement and the order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 902 of 2023. 6. This Court has heard learned counsel for the revisionist and has perused the settlement agreement as well as the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present revision pending. 7. Accordingly, the present revision is disposed of, and the impugned orders dated 06.08.2018 and 30.07.2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Misc. Case No. 191 of 2017, as well as the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2019, are hereby quashed, in terms of the settlement agreement and the order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Petition(s) (Criminal) No(s). 902 of 2023. ( Alok Mah r a, J.) 19.12.2025 BS BALWANT SINGH Digitally signed by BALWANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=fbbd191c8bdb8b16e8ca7937deaf72a17c02fe2eacbf28cdf4 ba7ce8640c5820, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=04E141DF4614F9A4D5F48346EB553DE5185F418755 DC00A7A13C14A680C3FA90, cn=BALWANT SINGH Date: 2025.12.20 14:28:33 +05'30'