SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:649 COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 04.02.2025 ABA No. 102 of 2025 Sri Pankaj Purohit, J. 1. Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Ms. Kavya Mehrishi, learned counsel for the informant though video conferencing. 4. The present anticipatory bail application is arising out of FIR No.0019 of 2025, dated 25.01.2025, under Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of IPC, registered at P.S. Bansant Vihar, District Dehradun. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. It is argued by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant that the applicant is a house wife; in the FIR, the entire allegations have been made against one Smt. Veena Sharma, regarding which the applicant has no role to play; the FIR lodged against the applicant is a counter-blast of another FIR lodged by the husband of the applicant against the informant- Arjun Sharma, and his family members, being FIR No.64 of 2023, registered at P.S. Rajpur Road, Dehradun, and the applicant is neither a party, nor a witness to the alleged transaction; the informant, in order to usurp the property of Smt. Veena Sharma, has lodged the present FIR, in which, the applicant has falsely been booked, as her husband helps Smt. Veena Sharma. 7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents opposed the anticipatory bail application by arguing that the applicant has been named in the FIR, and there are serious allegations against the applicant. 8. Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant- Ms. Sangeeta Uniyal is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of her arrest, on furnishing her personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the I.O. concerned, on the following conditions:- “(i) Applicant shall attend the Trial Court regularly and she shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court. 9. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon her, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. 10. Anticipatory Bail Application (No.102 of 2025) stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) Vacation Judge 04.02.2025 NISHANT