HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10828 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties 1 to 4. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party No. 5 stands dispensed with. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 20th August 2025, issued by opposite party number 5, i.e.Prescribed Authority, Good Stark Services, Rahim Nagar, Dudauli, Lucknow. 3. Mr. Divakar Singh learned State Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of the fact that opposite party No. 5 being a private company which has dispensed with services of petitioner, does not come within the purview of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and therefore this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. 4. In view of such a preliminary objection being raised, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of instructions, seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach in the appropriate forum. 5. In view of such a submission being made, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievances in the appropriate forum. September 16, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sikandar Yadav, Veer Bahadur Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Kanchan Sonkar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Women Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench