HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5550 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Pratyush Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Vikram Singh Chauhan, the learned A.G.A for the State. 2. The learned A.G.A has has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C/528 B.N.S.S. 3. Confronted with this objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition under the aforesaid provision. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Let the certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies of the same on record. September 18, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratyush Mishra, Abhishek Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Arun Kumar Tomar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench