Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9816 SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PSS 1 1 7 8 / 2 0 2 3
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy AG, for the State.
(2) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer order, impugned in this writ petition, was subsequently cancelled by the competent authority. He thus subm its that in view of the subsequent developments, writ petition has become infructuous.
(3) Accordingly, writ petition is dism issed as infructuous.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
7 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d46 2503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58 C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.07 13:44:23 +05'30'
2025:UHC:9816