HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10919 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Tushar Bhushan, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to State respondents to set aside/quash the oral order of termination dated 01.01.2023, terminating the services of the petitioner on Class IV post. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was appointed in August, 2001 as a Daily Wager on Group D Class IV post, in Social Forestry Division, Urai and thereafter from August, 2001 till 31.12.2022, the petitioner discharged his duties on the post of Khallasi. It has further been submitted that when the petitioner reported for his duty on 01.01.2023 in Katarniaghat Vanya Jeev Prabhag, Bahraich, he was not allowed and permitted to discharge his duties and was not allowed to mark his attendance in the attendance register. 4. He further submits that no work is being taken from the petitioner since 01.01.2023 till date, and the petitioner is not being allowed to discharge his duties on Class IV post, even though the petitioner is always willing and ready to discharge his duties on his post but no work is being taken from the petitioner on Class IV. 3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 26.08.2025 (Annexure No. 2) which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dilip Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) submit that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondents for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 26.08.2025 (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law from the date a copy of this order is produced before him and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Manish Mathur,J.) September 17, 2025 AKK WRIA No. 10919 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench