IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9378/2025 Decided on: 05.06.2025 Sarita Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Petitioner’s grievance is against the order dated 28.05.2025, whereby the respondent-Education Department allowed the representation of respondent No.3 pursuant to the decision rendered in Meenakshi Kumari Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 Respondent No.3, on completion of her tenure, was transferred from hard area to a soft area i.e. at the place of posting of petitioner. To make way for respondent No.3, petitioner was transferred to Government High School Sailli U/c Government Senior Secondary 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No. 3737/2025 decided on 18.03.2025 2 School Aura, District Chamba. Petitioner is aggrieved against her transfer to the said station. 2. It is seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation to the employer for the redressal of her grievances. It is for the petitioner to represent to the employer and for the employer to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in such like matter. 3. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 5th June, 2025(rohit)