Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165159 (ALL)

NADEEM QURAISHI @ NADEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8870/2025 · 2025-09-16

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8870 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Ghufran Hussain, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.656 of 2025 under Sections 316(2), 318(2), 61(2) of B.N.S. & 3/5(1) U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 07.07.2025 against the applicant, his wife and wife's brother Zishan Waris Ansari, stating that the complainant was in a relationship with the applicant for the past considerable period of time. He used to take her to a Hotel repetitively and committed the misdeed with her and he took Rs.1,50,000/- from her. It is alleged that the applicant's wife co-accused Shibli Ansari took away chain and ring from the complainant. Although the applicant denies that the co-accused Shibli Ansari is his wife. The FIR alleges that the co-accused Zishan Waris Ansari has projected himself as Hindu and he told his name as Samar Singh. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The applicant's wife co-accused Shibli has already been granted bail by means of an order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the Sessions Judge, Barabanki. 6. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith the statement of the complainant recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she has not levelled any allegation against the applicant. 7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application and on the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ghufran Hussain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nadeem Quraishi @ Nadeem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) basis of written instructions, he has submitted that allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has been submitted on 26.07.2025. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Nadeem Quraishi @ Nadeem be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 16, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8870 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench