Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165155 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8871/2025 · 2025-09-16

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8871 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, learned Addl. Government Advocate, and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application the applicant Lavkush Shukla seeks bail in Case Crime No.85 of 2021, under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a first information report lodged on 01.04.2021 by a Basic Shiksha Adhikari against 92 persons stating that all those persons have secured appointment on the basis of forged documents. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted two co-accused persons- Daya Shankar Chaudhari and Lavkush Shukla, charged with similar allegations, have already been granted bail by this Court by means of orders dated 06.06.2023 and 10.07.2023 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 7372 of 2023 and 5643 of 2023. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and Keeping in view the fact that the F.I.R. contains general allegations against all the accused persons, and two co-accused persons have already been granted bail, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the aforementioned case on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. September 16, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8871 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench