MO. JUBER SIDDIQUI v. ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CITY (EAST), LKO. AND OTHERS
/5645/2025 · 2025-09-23
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5645 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Sri Wazhul Qamar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for respondent No.1.
1. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner had entered into an agreement with opposite party No.s 2 and 3 who are recorded tenure holders of gata No.2083 area 0.957 situated at Village Bhatgaon, Pargana Bijnaur, Tehsil-Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow and consideration was also given by the petitioner. It is stated that on the basis of the aforesaid agreement permission has also been obtained from opposite party No.1 i.e. Additional District Magistrate, City (East), District Lucknow as opposite party No.s 2 and 3 are persons belonging to scheduled caste but instead of selling the disputed property to the petitioner opposite party No.s 2 and 3 have sold the land to opposite party No.s 4 and 5.
2. Against the order dated 20.8.2024 granting permission for sale in favour of the petitioner restoration application has been filed but the same has not been registered and accordingly the present petition has been filed.
3. On the basis of the written instructions received, learned Standing counsel has informed this Court that the application of the petitioner has already been reconsidered and registered before opposite party
4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Wazhul Qamar, Premkant Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mo. Juber Siddiqui .....Petitioner(s) Addl. District Magistrate, City (East), Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
No.1 as case No.3291/2025, computerized case No.D202510460003291.
Considering the fact that the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied and the case has already been registered, no further directions are required to be issued. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of in terms of the instructions received by learned State counsel.
5. September 23, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5645 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench