OM PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WPIL/976/2025 · 2025-09-19
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165107 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165107 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 976 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Sri O.P. Tiwari, the Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions states that the constructions proposed are being done after passing of the resolution by the Gaon Sabha. In view thereof, no ground for interference is made out. The writ petition is dismissed on the basis of the instructions. September 19, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Jainendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh, Ram Kumar Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Om Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench