1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 17 of 2019 1 - Smt. Vimla Bai D/o Late Shri Padmakar Pandey Aged About 60 Years W/o Shri Dhuvendra Kumar Tiwari, R/o Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Nirmala Bai D/o Late Shri Padmakar Pandey Aged About 58 Years W/o Shri Dhruw Kumar Tiwari, Aged About 58, R/o Lohfandi, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Saraswati Bai D/o Late Shri Padmakar Pandey Aged About 50 Years W/o Raj Kumar Dubey, R/o Village Mungeli, Tahsil And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Ramdulari Bai D/o Late Shri Padmakar Pandey Aged About 45 Years W/o Shri Rajkumar Dubey, R/o Village Madanpur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Gita Bai D/o Late Shri Padmakar Pandey Aged About 40 Years W/o Shri Kamlesh Pandey, R/o Bahurata, Tahsil Takhatpur, And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh........(Plaintiff), ... Appellants versus 1 - Smt. Tikamati Patel W/o Devnarayan Patel Aged About 43 Years R/o Khairpur Tahsil And Disrtict- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Sammukh Prasad Pandey (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated 24-03-2022. 2.1 - (A). Smt. Asha Pandey W/o Late Shri Sammukh Prasad Pandey R/o Dayalbandh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2.2 - (B). Ashutosh Pandey S/o Late Shri Sammukh Prasad Pandey Aged About 20 Years R/o Dayalbandh, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.26 14:28:38 +0530 2 2.3 - (C). Umakant Pandey S/o Late Shri Sammukh Prasad Pandey Aged About 18 Years R/o Dayalbandh, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Amit Buxy, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ. Order on Board (26.09.2025) 1. Heard application for withdrawal of appeal on account of compromise taken between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that compromise has been taken place between the parties, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the withdrawal application, the same is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of on account of compromise effected between the parties. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Prakash