Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165092 (ALL)

SUKANTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/9199/2025 · 2025-09-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9199 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. It is informed by the learned Standing Counsel that the shop in question has been allotted in an open meeting and the allotment order has been handed over. 2. In light of this subsequent development, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as aforesaid. September 18, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sukanti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench