ROSHAN ALIAS ROSHAN SINGH S/O NARAYAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2401/2025 · 2025-04-29
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16508 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16508 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2401/2025 Roshan Alias Roshan Singh S/o Narayan Singh, R/o Ward No.2, Neta Wali Dhaani, Kishan Garh, Renwaal, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Satveer Singh S/o Sriram Singh, R/o Vill.-Nathusar, Post- Rampur, Alwar, Raj.
3. Saroj Kanwar Urf Guddi W/o Late Sh. Gopal Singh, R/o 35, Keshav Nagar, Niwaroo Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur(Raj.)
4. Laxmi Kanwar W/o Satveer Singh, R/o 35, Keshav Nagar, Niwaroo Road, Jhotwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Sawai Singh, SHO PS Kardhani, Jaipur Mr. Devendra Kumar Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 29/04/2025 In compliance of the directions passed in the erstwhile order, Investigating Officer has marked presence before this Court and has apprised this Court that approximately 24 criminal antecedents are registered against the petitioner. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the fact that approximately 24 criminal antecedents are registered against the petitioner and the said fact is concealed from this Court. Therefore, by placing reliance upon
[2025:RJ-JP:18046] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2401/2025] the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Munnesh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).1400/2025, this Court deems it apposite to dismiss the present petition with a cost of Rs. 25000/- be imposed on the petitioner and the same is directed to be deposited with Police Welfare Fund. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-229