SANDEEP @ TARACHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
A482/7992/2025 · 2025-09-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7992 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS") has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all the cases in which he was roped in.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in three cases. He has next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District - Lucknow are as under : (i) Cases Crime No.197/2015, Under Section 41/411/413/414 IPC, Police Station Aliganj, District- Lucknow, (ii) Crime No.93/2015 Under Section 392/411/34 IPC Police Station Aliganj, District- Lucknow (iii) Case Crime No. 196/2015 Under Section 393 IPC Police Station Aliganj, District- Lucknow. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kumar, Pramendra Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep @ Tarachandra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023), the present application is allowed with a direction that in case the applicant provides two sureties and bail bond in Cases Crime No.197/2015, Under Section 41/411/413/414 IPC, Police Station - Aliganj, District - Lucknow, then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant in District-Lucknow, as mentioned above, and the applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties. September 18, 2025 ML/- A482 No. 7992 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench