HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9200 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Gopal Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ravi Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 as well as Mrs. Aditi Tripathi, learned counsel, who has filed her 'vakalatnama' on behalf of the opposite party no.3, which is taken on record and perused the material available on record. 2. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that despite having approval from the Pharmacy Council of India for the Academic Session 2025-26, the request for grant of affiliation is not being processed by the respondent no.3. 3. The issue as raised, was squarely decided by this Court in Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025 and directions were also given to the university and the State to take steps for grant of affiliation within the timeline fixed by the Supreme Court, the present petition is disposed of on the same terms and conditions with directions upon the respondent no.1 and 3 to grant the affiliation within the time line fixed, the other observations in the said judgment shall also apply while granting the affiliation to the petitioner's institution. September 23, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gopal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aditi Tripathi, Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Ravi Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sarvajanik Pharmacy College Thru. Manager Uday Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench