Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165060 (ALL)

XYZ, COMPLAINANT IN CASE CRIME NO. 172/2022 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/20/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 20 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. In view of incurable defect, learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal along with the application for condonation of delay may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh. 2. There is no objection by the other side. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty, as prayed for. September 23, 2025 Arpan Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Akash Tiwari, Shashank Shukla, Vikas Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Xyz, Complainant In Case Crime No. 172/2022 .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench