SHYAM SHANKAR SAROJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11048/2025 · 2025-09-18
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11048 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:-
" (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party no.3 to consider to claim of the petitioner for gant of antedated promotion to the post of Junior Assistant (Group C) with effect from the year 2008, when he became eligible, alongwith all consequential benefits/emoluments."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.3 i.e. Joint Director of Education, Prayagraj Mandal, Prayagraj who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsha Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shyam Shankar Saroj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench