PRABHU DAYAL MEENA S/O GARA RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6245/2025 · 2025-04-25
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6245/2025
1. Prabhu Dayal Meena S/o Gara Ram Meena, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Vpo Birol, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
2. Subhash Chandra Nandwana S/o Radhe Shyam Nandwana, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Ambika Niwas Old, Udaipur Road, Kapasan, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
3. Manzoor Khan Pathan S/o Mumtaz Khan Pathan, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Near Bada Talab, Ward No. 25, Kapasan, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
4. Rampal Mundra S/o Ganesh Lal Mundra, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Singhpur, Post Singhpur, Tehsil Kapasan, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
5. Mohamad Farid S/o Suleman Khan, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Vpo Behted, Tehsil Malarana Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
6. Surendra Pal Chadha S/o Sardari Lal Chada, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 432, Vinoba Basti, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
7. Satya Narayan Garg S/o Devi Lal Garg, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 2-B-48, Mataji Ke Mandir Ke Pass, Segwa Housing Board, Senthi, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 25/04/2025
1. Seven writ petitioners have filed this joint writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning their place of posting after extending promotion at different places.
[2025:RJ-JP:17622] (2 of 2) [CW-6245/2025]
2. Cause of action for each petitioner is separate and it is not a case of common or joint cause of action.
3. Counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an independent and separate writ petition for and on behalf of each petitioner.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/