SHRISTI YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/8979/2024 · 2025-03-11
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 165015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15019 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8979 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shristi Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Education, New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kewal Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Devendra Mohan Shukla,Nishant Shukla Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Devendra Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr. Nishant Shukla,
learned counsel for opposite party no.3. No one has appeared on behalf of Union of India (opposite party no.1).
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for permitting admission of petitioner in Class VI in Jawahar Lal Navodaya Vidyalaya (Deoria) Manakpur, District Gonda.
3. Learned counsel for opposite party no.3 on the basis of instructions and counter affidavit filed submits that the petitioner in fact is a repeater having already failed in the aforesaid class earlier and has thereafter submitted a second application form which is not maintainable.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner has refuted
submissions advanced by learned learned counsel for opposite party no.3 with the submission that there appears to be some misconception with the opposite parties regarding identity of the petitioner who is not a repeater.
5. Since disputed questions of fact pertaining to identity of petitioner are involved, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Principal Jawahar Lal Navodaya Vidyalaya (Deoria) Mankapur, Gonda who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously within a period of two weeks from the date of submission of representation. It shall be open to the petitioner to confirm her identity through evidence which shall
be produced before concerned authority.
6. With the aforesaid observation, petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Subodh/- Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench