Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165007 (ALL)

VIRENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/10978/2024 · 2025-05-12

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27704 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10978 of 2024 Applicant :- Virendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Kanaujia,Mohd. Amir Khan,Sheelam Devi,Surya Prakash,Tufail Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. Sri Surya Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, the learned A.G.A.- I for the State, are present. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 495 of 2023, under Sections 376(2)n, IPC and Section 5J(2)16 and 5L/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Rampur Mathura, District Sitapur. After advancing submissions at some length, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this bail application at this stage and that he will file a fresh bail application after examination of witnesses of fact by the trial court. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this bail-application is rejected as not pressed, observing that the trial court shall proceed to record statements of witnesses of fact expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench