Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 165002 (ALL)

SHAMA PARVEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8852/2025 · 2025-09-16

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8852 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pramod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Sikha Sinha, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0440 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Unnao. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 07.06.2023 against five persons, stating that co-accused Sunaina is daughter of one Sumitra. Sunaina and her husband Nand Kishor entered into a deal to sell the land belonging to Sumitra for a sale consideration of Rs.95,00,000/- and they got the sale deed executed on 30.05.2023 in favour of the informant by setting up an impostor in place of the land holder Sumitra. 4. The applicant is said to be the impostor who had executed the sale deed. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent widow aged 29 years, she has been falsely implicated in the present case and she has no criminal history. The applicant is languishing in jail since 15.06.2023. 6. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant was made to execute the document under pretext of getting her benefit of some government scheme. 7. Co-accused persons Nand Kishor, Sushil Kumar and Sunaina have already been granted bail in the present case. Copies of their bail orders have been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shama Parveen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) annexed as Annexure 5 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. 8. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the bail application and she has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 04.07.2023. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant - Shama Parveen be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 16, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8852 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench