Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16500 (KAR)

MANJU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1943/2025 · 2025-06-20

S Vishwajith Shetty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21445 CRL.P No. 1943 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1943 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MANJU, SON OF KARIPUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT MYLANAYAKANA HALLI, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATANA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 562 160. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDITA RAMESH., ADVOCATE (V/O DATED 20.06.2025, THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER IS PEMITTED TO RETIRE FROM THE CASE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY CHENNAPATNA RURAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA PROSECUTOR, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL U/S 483 OF BNSS (SEC.439 OF CRPC) IN CR.NO.213/2023 FOR THE Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21445 CRL.P No. 1943 of 2025 OFFENCES P/U/S 302, 324, 354, 448 AND 504 OF IPC 1860,REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE (CHENNAPATNA RURAL POLICE STATION) AGAINST THE PETITIONER PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, CHANNAPATNA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for retirement along with an acknowledgement dated 07.05.2025 and perusal of the acknowledgement would go to show that the case papers relating to this petition was handed over to one Sri.Parthasarathy on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody. 2. The memo and acknowledgement produced along with memo is taken on record. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to retire in this case. There is no alternative arrangement made on behalf of the petitioner, though the file was handed over by the learned advocate to the party concerned on 07.05.2025 itself. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21445 CRL.P No. 1943 of 2025 4. Under the circumstances, this Court has no option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. 5. Accordingly, petitioner is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33