REETA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL.CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8770/2025 · 2025-10-07
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8770 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction commanding the respondent authorities to restrain the opposite party Nos. 4 & 5 not to create public nuisance in peaceful living of the petitioner.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 who are the neighbour of the petitioner, are creating nuisance.
4. In case the private respondents are creating nuisance, it is always open for the petitioner to submit a complaint in this regard either to the I.G.R.S. or to the police, on the number which is available in the public domain.
5. It is expected that in case any such complaint is made by the petitioner, the authority will look into the same and take action in this regard.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. October 7, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Reeta Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench