Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16497 (AP)

T J SUNDARAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14441/2020 · 2025-09-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010219362020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14441/2020 Between: 1. T J SUNDARAM, S/O. YELLAMANDA, AGE. 64, R/O. GUNDALAPLLI VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D. NO. 2/28-B, ANANTHAPURAMU CITY AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ITUKALAPALLI POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 3. K PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O. MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM 4. K R RAMAMOHAN REDDY, S/O. K. CHENNA REDDY R/O. RACHANAPALLI VILLAGE, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL, MANDAL AND DISTRICT 5. RAGE BOJJAPPA, S/O. NARAYANA R/O. PINNADARI VILLAGE, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 6. K RANGANATH, S/O. LATE K. RANGAPPA R/O. FLAT NO. 406, PATEL ROAD, ANANTHAPURAMU CITY AND MANDAL ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. KALYAN C R THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14441 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 2nd respondent in not providing police aid for implementing the Injunction order dated 18.11.2016 in I.A. No. 1702 of 2014 in O.S. No. 551 of 2014 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapur as illegal, arbitrary and in flagrant disregard to law and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri M. Karibasaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that respondent No.2 is not providing police aid for implementing the injunction order dated 18.11.2016 in I.A.No.1702 of 2014 in O.S.No.551 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapur. Learned counsel would also submit that necessary direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there are civil disputes regarding the subject property and police are not interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before the competent Civil Court where a civil suit is pending. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14441 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 153