Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164951 (ALL)

AVDHESH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/9618/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9618 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed seeking enlargement on bail in FIR No.340 of 2025, under Section 115(2), 352, 351 (2), 105, 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Lalganj, District Raebareli. 3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that there was an old enmities in between the parties and today at about 7:30 PM, the accused persons came and hurling abuses and when it was resisted, the accused assaulted by rod to the father-in-law and thereafter ran away, which resulted into substantial injury. The father-in-law died after 12 days of the incident due to antemortem septicemia. Two injuries noted in the postmortem report were on left elbow joint and the abrasion present in lumbar region. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the injuries which were allegedly inflicted on non-vital part and the cause of death due to septicemia, prima faice a case for bail is made out particularly when the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 04.08.2025. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicants Avdhesh and Suraj be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report number on their furnishing personal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shishir Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Avdhesh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9618 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench