- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7006 CRL.P No. 6320 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6320 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. NETHRAVATHI, W/O HEMACHANDRA, AGED 41 YEARS, 2. SHARATH K.H. S/O HEMACHANDRA, AGED 22 YEARS, 3. RAKSHITHA K.H. D/O LATE HEMACHANDRA AGED 17 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.3 IS MINOR REP BY HER N/G AND MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1, ALL ARE R/O KODIHALLI KAVALU, KOTANAYAKANAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 202. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAMOD R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE BY TURUVEKERE POLICE REPRESENTED BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 01 2. TEJPAL, S/O SHIVPPA, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O KODIHALLI KAVALU, KASABA HOBLI, TIPTUR TALUK, Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7006 CRL.P No. 6320 of 2020 TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 202. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED ON THE BASIS OF CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE I.E., TURUVEKERE POLICE FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 279, 304(A) OF IPC IN C.C.NO.419/2018 (CR.NO.181/2018) ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., TURUVEKRE. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. There is no representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 2.50 p.m. The order sheet dated 03.12.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for petitioners submits that he is challenging the abated charge sheet filed against the husband of the petitioner. learned Additional SPP submits that the trial court has already concluded the trial and the matter is already disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce the judgment of the trial court in the criminal case and also to comply with the office objections before next date of hearing. list this matter finally after one week." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7006 CRL.P No. 6320 of 2020 In spite of that, there is no compliance of the office objections. It appears that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6