Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16495 (JHR)

Sushil Kumar v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India And Ors

WPC/822/2017 · 2025-02-06

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017 ------ Sushil Kumar, son of Late Shri Ram Narayan Prasad, resident of Sarda Nilay, New Area, Rafi Ganj, Aurangabad, P.O. & P.S. Rafiganj, District Aurangabad. … … Petitioner Versus 1. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai, P.O. Yogakshema Building, P.S. Nariman Point, District Mumbai. 2. Executive Director (Marketing/PD), Central Office, Marketing Department, 3rd Floor, Yogakshema Building, West Wing Jeevan Bima Marg, Mumbai, P.O. Yogakshema Building, P.S. Nariman Point, District Mumbai. 3. Manager, Sales, Jamshedpur Division, Jeevan Prakash Bistupur Main Road, Jamshedpur, Bistupur, District East Singhbhum 4. Senior Divisional Manager, Jeevan Prakash, Bistupur, Main Road, Jamshedpur, Bistupur, District East Singhbhum. 5. Zonal Manager, East Central Zone Office, Estate Department, 5th Floor, Jeevan Deep, Exhibition Road, Patna, P.O. & P.S. Exhibition Road, District Patna. 6. Union of India, through Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), North Block, New Delhi, P.O. & P.S. Sansad Marg, District New Delhi, Pin-110001. … … Respondents WITH W.P.(S) No.854 of 2017 Alok Pathak. … … Petitioner Versus Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Dubey, Advocate Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate-cum-ASGI Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG-II Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, CGC ------ 24/ 06.02.2025 I.A. No.1460 of 2025 in W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017 Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition being W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017. This interlocutory application to that effect has been filed. 2. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioner, permission is granted for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2 3. Thus, this interlocutory application is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition being W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn, without entering into the grounds of withdrawal. 5. I.A. No.3796 of 2021 in W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017, also stands disposed of. W.P.(S) No.854 of 2017 The file of writ petition being W.P.(S) No.822 of 2017 be detached from this case. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-2