IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAia^' (Special Original Jurisdiction) 'P m O) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY" TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12718 OF 2025 Between: Kalikiri Savithramma, W/o V. Gopal Reddy, Aged about 51 Employee in Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Residing at D.No.83, KTC Tupe Quarters, KT Road, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. years ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh. 2. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chittoor at Tirupati. 3. K. Vijaya, W/o K. Jayasekhar Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 38 years. Business, Proprietor, M/s. Vijaya Enterprises and Civil Constructions, Residing at Gangamambapuram Village, Balajipalli Post, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may ^ ■■ be pleased to issue Wirt or direction particularly in the form of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the impugned order holding there is no deficiency of service on the part of the 3rd respondent when it gave finding that it had no jurisdiction to grant the relief of specific performance when the 3rd respondent violated the terms of contract / agreement 18-12-2018 and consequently to declare the impugned order dated 11.01.2024 passed in CC.29 of 2021 on the file of the 2nd respondent without jurisdiction, illegal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. PEDDI VIJAYBHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following order: ’ APHC010219262025 Bench Sr.No:-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [0] WRIT PETITION NO: 12718 of 2025 ...Petitioner Kalikiri Savithramma Vs. ...Respondents The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Sri Peddi Vijaybhaskar Learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Advocate for Petitioner Advocate for Respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 9th May 2025 PC: In view of the fact that there is an effective alternate remedy available to the petitioner by way of an appeal before the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, we do not deem it a fit case to ’t ‘ ' i invoke our extraordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed, Sd/- A. VIJAYA BA3U ASSISTANT REGsS i RAR 2. //TRUE COPY// t SECTION OFFICER To, 1. OneCCto Sri. Peddi Vijaybhaskar Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies n.QP HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12718of 2025 » 2 J MAY 2|)?5 I Currem o«uon . >sS?SPATCHt2^ Ti*' DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS