SATENDRA PRAKASH TYAGI AND 30 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. FINANCE GOVT. LKO. AND 18 OTHERS
WRIA/10869/2025 · 2025-09-16
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10869 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders. and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the relevant Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990 and 08.12. 2008.
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioners are squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025.
4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioners of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). September 16, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaushlendra Yadav, Armendra Pratap Singh, Virendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Satendra Prakash Tyagi And 30 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Finance Govt. Lko. And 18 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench