KEVALA DEVI v. 1ST ADDL. PRIN. JUDGE FAMILY COURT SULTANPUR U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
A483/788/2025 · 2025-09-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 788 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the prayer clause as on place of 'Section 529 of B.N.S.S./483 of Cr.P.C.', 'Section 528 of the B.N.S.S./482 of Cr.P.C.' has wrongly been mentioned. He submits that he may be permitted to correct the same during the course of the day.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the same during course of the day. Office is directed to reallocate the number to this application. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application under section 483 Cr.P.C./529 of the B.N.S.S., has been filed with the prayer to direct the opposite party number 2 to stop the retiral dues of the opposite party No.3 till the payment of the dues maintenance amount or till the disposal of the application dated 25.04.2025, which is pending before the Ist Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Sultanpur, U.P. in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1158/2024, Kevala Devi Versus Ram Deo, under section 147 of BNSS in interest of justice, otherwise applicant will suffer irreparable and injury, which can not compensated in any manner. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Salik Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kevala Devi .....Applicant(s) 1st Addl. Prin. Judge Family Court Sultanpur U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter pertains to the year 2024 and even after passing of about 1 year, the proceeding of the case has not been concluded as yet. After arguing at some length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the trial court to decide the matter within the stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court. Considering aforesaid innocuous prayer, the trial court concerned is
directed to consider and decide the Case No. 1158/2024, if the matter is still pending consideration, with expedition, in accordance with law considering the instructions and guidelines issued by this court; time to time. With the aforesaid observation, the instant application stands
disposed of.
September 18, 2025 AKS A483 No. 788 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench