SMT. BITTO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10800/2025 · 2025-09-16
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10800 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Ajitanshu Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Tripathi,
learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The petitioner, a widow contends that her husband namely Sri Raju who was working as Sweeper under the respondent no. 3, retired on 30.06.2021 and died in the year 2023 yet she has neither been paid the retiral dues and the family pension and hence the petition for payment of retiral dues and grant of family pension.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Ajitanshu Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Tripathi,
learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Tripathi Smt. Bitto .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 16, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 10800 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench