HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9034 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Mohd. Altaf Mansoor, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) as well as Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- authority and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that challenging an order of demolition, an appeal has been preferred, in the said appeal an interim application has also been filed, however, no orders have been passed on the said interim application and the respondent- authority are threatening to demolish the construction despite the appeal being pending. 3. After hearing counsels for the parties, the present petition is disposed of directing the appellate authority to make an endevaour to decide the appeal with all expedition preferably within a period of four months. 4. Till the disposal of the appeal, no action for demolition shall take place. 5. In the meanwhile, the petitioner would also be entitled to press his compounding application, which has been moved after the new building bye-laws on 29.08.2025. The respondent-authority shall take a decision on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd.Altaf Mansoor, Tanay Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Shri Durga Prasad Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the said application also within a period of three months. September 11, 2025 Praveen WRIC No. 9034 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench