HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8847 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Dharmendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Angad Kumar Vishvakarma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.137 of 2025, under Sections 61(2)A, 309(6), 311, 352, 351(3), 317(2) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 28.07.2025 stating that while the informant was returning from his jewellery shop carrying 7 kg of silver and 17 grams of gold jewellery, four persons riding two motorcycles robbed him and took away the bag containing the jewellery. 4. The police claims to have arrested two accused persons on the basis of an information received from a mukhbir and in their custodial statement they implicated the applicant. On the basis of this information, the police arrested the applicant and recovered some jewellery from his scooter. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent young man aged 22 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. It has further been stated that the applicant's father has a jewellery shop. The jewellery recovered from the applicant was of the aforesaid shop, which had been purchased from one Ambey Jewellery shop through 2 separate tax invoices dated 26.07.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Abhishek Soni .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated because the applicant's cousin lodged a complaint against the co-accused persons, who have implicated the applicant as a counterblast measure. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail applicant and he has submitted that the investigation is still going on. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Abhishek Soni be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 16, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8847 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench