RAHUL MISHRA @ RAHUL KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
A482/7836/2025 · 2025-09-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164874 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164874 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7836 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the applicant to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every eighteen cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the eighteen cases. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in eighteen cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1)Case Crime No. 615 of 2021, under Sections 420,406 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 2)Case Crime No. 171 of 2020, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 3) Case Crime No. 515 of 2022, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 4)Case Crime No. 787 of 2021, under sections 420,406,323,504 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 5)Case Crime No. 152 of 2021, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohit Sharma, Mukul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Mishra @ Rahul Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6)Case Crime No. 872 of 2020, under Sections 420,406,504 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 7)Case Crime No. 626 of 2021, under Sections 420,406,504,506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 8)Case Crime No. 93 of 2021, under Sections 420,406,323,504 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 9)Case Crime No. 777 of 2020, under Sections 420,406,504 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 10)Case Crime No. 126 of 2020, under Sections 420,406,504 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 11)Case Crime No. 823 of 2021, under Sections 420,406,504 & 506 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 12)Case Crime No. 761 of 2022, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya.
13)Case Crime No. 763 of 2022, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 14)Case Crime No. 614 of 2021, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 15)Case Crime No. 747 of 2021, under Sections 420,406 of IPC, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 16)Case Crime No. 14 of 2022, under Sections 3(1) of UPG Act, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 17)Case Crime No. 767 of 2020, under Sections 138 of N.I. Act, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 18)Case Crime No. 546 of 2020, under Sections 138 of N.I. Act, PS - Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poo person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated A482 No. 7836 of 2025 2
29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioners to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 18, 2025 AKS A482 No. 7836 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench