AMARNATH @ GUDDU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1273/2025 · 2025-09-16
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1273 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Rahul Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Aayush Sharma, the learned State Counsel.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, is taken on record.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant has restricted his prayer for giving the applicant an opportunity to file an application for bail before the trial court.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail before the trial court and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 16, 2025 KR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Kumar Shukla, Mohit Singh, Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Amarnath @ Guddu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench