HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5846 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Prince Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya, to decide Application under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 bearing Case No. 6177 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230406177) - Shafikunnisha Vs. Azmat Ali, filed against order passed in Case No. 2065 of 2018, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Application under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 bearing Case No. 6177 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230406177) - Shafikunnisha Vs. Azmat Ali, filed against order passed in Case No. 2065 of 2018, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 25, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prince Singh, Prabhat Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Avida Bano .....Petitioner(s) Sub District Magistrate, Milkipur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench