HIMANSHU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/7923/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7923 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 16082/2022 (State of U.P. vs Akhilesh Kumar and Others) arising out of FIR No. 327 of 2021, dated 10.08.2021, registered under sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Mohanlal Ganj, District-Lucknow, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 01.09.2021 submitted by the Investigating Officer, and impugned summoning order dated 22.05.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the court below. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yogendra Singh, Amritesh Kumar Tripathi, Parth Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Himanshu Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). The application is disposed of accordingly. September 23, 2025 AKS A482 No. 7923 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench