Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164812 (ALL)

SMT. SNEH LATA v. U.P. STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER

WRIA/10758/2025 · 2025-09-17

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10758 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Abhinit Jaiswaal, Advocate who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents no. 1 & 2 which is taken on record. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 3. The petitioner, a widow of one Piyush Sharma has approached this Court contending that Piyush Sharma had been appointed as Casual Labour in the year 1999 and died after having rendered continuous service of about twenty two years on 17.08.2022. 4. During the time the petitioner's husband was working in the department, his case for regularization had also been processed but the final orders had not been passed. 5. Contention is that considering the long period of service rendered by the petitioner's husband, the petitioner may be considered for compassionate appointment. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Shri Abhinit Jaiswaal, Advocate has no objection. 7. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. 8. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Singh Tomar, Surya Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Smt. Sneh Lata .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Warehousing Corporation Lko. Thru. Managing Director And Another .....Respondent(s) 9. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 17, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10758 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench