HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5511 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioners, who has filed a supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not wish to press his reliefs No.1 and 2 and his petition may be considered only for the Relief No.3. He seeks leave of the Court to permit him to make an endorsement on the memo of petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to do the needful during the course of the day. 5. Considering the limited extent of the request and the prayer made, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 i.e. District Judge, Lakhimpur Kheri where an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the petitioners on 18.08.2025 is pending to consider and decide the pending application for ad-interim injunction on the next date fixed (which is reported to be 07.10.2025). In case, if the same is not possible, then within two weeks thereafter. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Susheel Kumar @ Susheel Kashyap And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) District Judge Lakhimpur Kheri U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) parties on merits and the Appellate Court Court concerned shall consider and decide the application for ad-interim injunction of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 Rakesh/- A227 No. 5511 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench