Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16477 (JHR)

THE JHARKHAND ACADEMIC COUNCIL RANCHI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN v. HARDAYAL MAHTO

LPA/345/2024 · 2025-06-11

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15031 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 344 of 2024 1. Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi, through its Chairman 2. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi 3. The Joint Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi … … Appellants Versus 1. Kanhaiya Prasad, son of Ram Prasad, resident of Indraprasth Colony, Bariatu, Ranchi 2. The State of Jharkhand … … Respondents With L.P.A. No. 345 of 2024 1. Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi, through its Chairman 2. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi 3. The Joint Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi … … Appellants Versus 1. Haridayal Mahto, son of Late Prahlad Mahto, resident of Mahaveer Colony, Lowadih, Namkum, Ranchi 2. The State of Jharkhand … … Respondents With L.P.A. No. 346 of 2024 1. Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi, through its Chairman 2. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi 3. The Joint Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi … … Appellants Versus 1. Binayak Mishra, son of Late Muni Nath Mishra, resident of Nagwa, P.O. & P.S.- Lanka, District- Varanasi (U.P.) 2. The State of Jharkhand … … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellants : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1: Mrs. Aprajita Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondent No. 2: Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III ----- 09/11.06.2025 Since the appellants have conceded in paragraph-6 of the impugned order dated 20.12.2023 through its counsel that the 2025:JHHC:15031 2 issue raised in the writ petitions is covered by the judgment passed in W.P.(S) No. 3162 of 2018 which was also affirmed up to the Hon’ble Apex Court, these instant appeals filed by the appellants are not maintainable. 2. Therefore, these appeals are dismissed. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish/Ritesh