SHESH RAM TIWARI v. TAHSILDAR TARBGANJ, GONDA AND OTHERS
A227/5581/2025 · 2025-09-17
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5581 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1. 2. In view of the order proposed, notice to Respondents No.2 & 3 is hereby dispensed with. 3. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia praying therein for the following relief:
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the opp. Party no.1 - Tehsildar Tarabganj, district Gonda to consider and decide the mutation case no.1202108300610075, Shesh Ram Tiwari Versus Estate of Ayodhya Prasad, under section 34 of the U.P Revenue Code, expeditiously with in sharp and reasonable period in the interest of justice."
4. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that a case for mutation under Section 34 of the UP. Revenue Code, 2006 has been filed before the Tehsildar- Tarabganj District- Gonda on the basis of a registered Will Deed but the said case is pending and has not been decided till date. 5. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, has very fairly submitted that the ends of justice would be served, if a direction is issued by this Court thereby commanding Respondent No.1 to consider and decide the case in question, expeditiously, within the time frame fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Km. Niharika Mishra, Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shesh Ram Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Tahsildar Tarbganj, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s)
6. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsels for the parties and I find that the mutation case filed by the petitioner is pending before the Respondent No.1. 7. Accordingly, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to Respondent No.1, i.e., Tehsildar, Tehsil- Tarabganj, District- Gonda to consider and decide the Mutation Case No.1202108300610075, Shesh Ram Tiwari Versus Estate of Ayodhya Prasad, under section 34 of the U.P Revenue Code, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order before him, provided there is no legal impediment. 8. Needless to say that this Court has not adjudicated upon merits of the case.
September 17, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 5581 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench