REHMAT HUSEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9071/2025 · 2025-09-19
Manjive Shukla, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164767 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164767 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9071 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Sri Mohd. Shahzad Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri Farhan Habib, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3.
2. The captioned writ petition has been filed by the petitioner inter alia praying for the following reliefs:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.10.2019 as Annexure No.4 and reminder dated 26.07.2025 as Annexure No.5 to record the Choohaddi of the Waqf property in Revenue record in the light of Registered maintain under section 37 of Waqf Act, 1995 by speaking and reasoned order within a fixed period provided by this Hon'ble Court."
3. The petitioner in the writ petition has prayed for a direction thereby commanding the revenue authorities to record the boundaries of the property of Waqf No. 12, District- Raibareli in the revenue records.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent at the very outset has raised objection that there is no provision for mentioning boundaries of a property in the revenue records.
5. On being confronted, learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Shahzad Ahmad, Faraz Ahmad, Mohammad Taif, Shamshad Ahmad, Taiba Fatima Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Farhan Habib Rehmat Husen .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
position to reply that there is any provision under which the boundaries of any property can be entered into the revenue records.
6. We have considered the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and we find that the prayer made in the writ petition is absolutely misconceived as in the revenue records boundaries of a property are not mentioned.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. September 19, 2025 Anurag WRIC No. 9071 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench