HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8881 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Ms. Vina Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. On an objection raised by learned A.G.A. that Section 308(6) B.N.S. has been added during investigation in place of Section 308(3) B.N.S. but the petition has not been filed challenging the same, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with proper prayers. To which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. 3. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. September 26, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vina Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Rekha @ Rooprani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench