DEBAHUTI GOSWAMI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
WP(C)/4111/2024 · 2025-02-26
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16475 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16475 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010162822024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4111/2024 DEBAHUTI GOSWAMI AND ANR WIFE OF PARASH GOSWAMI, RESIDENT OF NEAR L.P. SCHOOL, BIRKUCHI NO. 2, PIN -781026, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
2: MANASH PROTIM GOSWAMI SON OF LT. MOHAN NARAYAN GOSWAMI
RESIDENT OF BYLANE 21 RAJABAHAR GAON NEAR DKD COLLEGE
WARD NO. 9 DERGAON PIN- 785614
DIST.- GOLAGHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
NOTICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (APSC) NOTICE THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN
JAWAHARNAGAR KHANAPARA
KAMRUP(M) GHY-22.
Page No.# 2/3 3:DIRECTORATE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D CHOUDHURY, MR S DIFUSA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, APSC Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/2906/2024 SMT. DEBAHUTI GOSWAMI AND ANR WIFE OF PARASH GOSWAMI
RESIDENT OF NEAR L.P. SCHOOL
BIRKUCHI NO. 2 GUWAHATI -781026
DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM.
2: MANASH PROTIM GOSWAMI SON OF LT. MOHAN NARAYAN GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF BYLANE 21 RAJABAHAR GAON NEAR DKD COLLEGE WARD NO. 9 DERGAON PIN- 785614 DIST.- GOLAGHAT ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
NOTICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-06 2:ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (APSC) NOTICE THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN JAWAHARNAGAR
Page No.# 3/3 KHANAPARA KAMRUP(M) GHY-22.
3:DIRECTORATE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. ------------ Advocate for : MR D CHOUDHURY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 27-02-2025 Mr. S. Difusa, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitioner is no longer keen to pursue this writ petition before this Court. Therefore, he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition. In view of the prayer made by Mr. Difusa, learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal. Consequently, the I.A. stands closed.
JUDGE GS Comparing Assistant