Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20362 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11152 of 2024 Applicant :- Majeed Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Vikas Singh holding brief of Sri Om Prakash Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Diwakar Singh, the learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Sessions Bail No. 2178/2024, Case Crime No. 217/1991, under Sections 302, 307 IPC, Police Station Sandila, District Hardoi. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 07.10.1991 stating that while the informant and his uncle were returning after irrigating their fields, two persons fired at them. Both of them suffered palate injuries. Upon hearing noise, several villagers chased the miscreants. The informant got injured and his uncle died due to injuries. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith copies of statements recorded during investigation and a copy of the charge sheet. 6. One Pitai stated during investigation that he had identified a person running away after the incident, one of whom was the applicant. 7. A supplementary affidavit has been filed annexing therewith a copy of statement of injured person who has been examined by the trial court as PW1. He has stated that he could not identify any person and he categorically stated that the applicant had not fired at him or the deceased person. He also stated that wife of the deceased Nanha had given an application to the police wherein she had stated that Jagdish Singh, Brij Raj Singh, Babu Singh and Uma Kant had killed her husband and she had not implicated the applicant. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant-Majeed be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench