Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16474 (KAR)

MUNIRAJU A v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/SENIOR MANAGER

WP/3820/2021 · 2025-01-07

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:399 WP No. 3820 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3820 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MUNIRAJU A., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA @ ANJANAPPA, R/AT NO.24, 7TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE, ST. BTM 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABDUL WAJID.S.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/SENIOR MANAGER, THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., H.O NEW NO.6, OLD NO.5, SN PRIDE 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS MADIWALA, BENGALURU - 560 068. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE BANGALORE CITY, CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NEW NO.6, OLD NO.5, SN PRIDE 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS MADIWALA, BENGALURU - 560 068. 3. SHIVALINGA GOWDA MAJOR IN AGE, SON OF NOT KNOWN, C/O THE BANGALORE CITY, CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:399 WP No. 3820 of 2021 NEW NO.6, OLD NO.5, SN PRIDE 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS MADIWALA, BENGALURU - 560 068. 4. VIJAY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF MUNIRAJU (LATE), RESIDENT OF NO.12, MILK COLONY, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE WEST - 560 055. 5. DEEPAK VIJAY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, SON OF VIJAY, RESIDENT OF NO.12, MILK COLONY, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE WEST - 560 055. 6. ADINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF NO. 38/35, 1ST MAIN, BEHIND SDA CHURCH, SUDHAMANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V.LOKESH., FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Siddaraju., counsel on behalf of Sri.K.V.Lokesh., for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:399 WP No. 3820 of 2021 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: 1. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or direction thereby appointing a Court - Monitored CCB or CBI Probe into the illegal activities on the part of the respondent Banks, who are directly or indirectly involved in committing irregularities in the matter of approval and Sanctioning of Term Loan to the petitioner, and the complicity of the Third Party Respondents, who have illegal withdrawn the Term loan amount from the petitioner's Personal Bank Account. 2. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Direction, Quashing the Impugned Notice, Dated:06.01.2021, Produced at Annexure-G duly signed by the first respondent, Authorized Officer. 3. Counsel for respondent No.1 urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:399 WP No. 3820 of 2021 4. Counsel Sri.Siddaraju., on instructions submits that the loan account of the petitioner is closed. Counsel therefore, submits that appropriate order may be passed. 5. Taking note of the submission that the loan account of the petitioner is closed nothing survives for consideration at this juncture. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 77